
On 14 August, the 41-year-old academic Jason Arday was found dead in Battersea, London. His death followed a relentless media blitz in which the previously unknown professor was subjected the sort of relentless coverage which is usually reserved for heads of state. The media figures joining in should really known better too; especially as the man who spearheaded the campaign against Arday is a proponent of the ‘race science’ that drove the Nazis:
This Was Posted Around 16:00 Yesterday, Just after Jason Arday Passed
Cofnas says he’s “waiting for the revolution” before getting another academic job, then says that after the revolution he’ll be “the head of the Department of Eugenics and Race Science at Harvard.” pic.twitter.com/o6YPYegX2T
— Save Our Citizenships (@LetsStopC9) August 15, 2026
‘Race realism’
The man in the video above is Nathan Cofnas. Cofnas was also an academic at Cambridge, but his criticism of equality, diversity, and inclusion programmes led to his departure. Cofnas’s objections to these programmes went way beyond the usual criticisms of fairness or legality too; he actually argued that in a true meritocracy, Black people:
would disappear from almost all high-profile positions outside of sports and entertainment.
Cofnas has described himself as a “race realist“. In other words, he’s someone who uses pseudoscience to argue that People of Colour are intellectually inferior to white people. So he has Nazi-style beliefs, in other words. And the media should have ensured this was a heavy focus in any reporting.
Some of the articles that The Telegraph alone published about Jason Arday.
It was way over the top. pic.twitter.com/xjfRKhDOAI
— Mukhtar (@I_amMukhtar) August 15, 2026
We didn’t just get more reporting than was warranted; we also got low quality reporting which failed to capture why Arday became such a singular point of focus. Cofnas himself is not shy about admitting this stuff either.
Jason Arday — “Too far”
In the clip above, Cofnas says:
Now, Arday was special. The reason Arday is getting a lot of attention is he took the plagiarism, which is fairly common in academia, too far. And he told these crazy lies about his personal life. And he had such an exalted position that the mismatch between the quality and the prestige was so enormous that there was a hook for a story. That was what was special about him. Not that he’s a fraud, not that he’s a worthless scholar. It’s that there was a story. There was a basis for a news story that would capture people’s attention.
While stories about Arday’s personal life have been drawn into question, it’s notable that he was cleared of the plagiarism accusations:
Jools documents how Professor Jason Arday was legitimately cleared of plagiarism with the main issue being poor referencing and The Spectator’s Lara Brown’s biased and anti DEI reporting on this. #RipJasonArday pic.twitter.com/geupLUtHPH
— Glow Lee (@GlowanneLee) August 15, 2026
As Cofnas notes, plagiarism accusations are also far from uncommon in the field of academia:
Facts. Nobody would give a shit. This was fuelled by racism! https://t.co/hh5wJXLg6V pic.twitter.com/RbE0uboY27
— Chim (@CoachChim) August 14, 2026
Cofnas continued:
… there are so many cases of people who are just like Arday, but there isn’t that kind of story potential. Well, maybe the lesson is this what’s happened if you don’t give Cofnas a job, right?
Cofnas later said:
Well, I have the job currently and I’m still waiting for the revolution to happen and then I’ll… It’s going to take a while. …get another job. After the revolution, I’ll be the head of the Department of Eugenics and Race Science at Harvard, maybe.
Focus
The outlets which delivered relentless coverage of Arday are the same ones who published stories like the following:
"It was in the public interest" from the class of people who produce this pic.twitter.com/5mjSDwmAqd
— Wontwo Badsoup (@wontwobadsoup) August 15, 2026
God, the avenging Furies had nothing on the Jeffrey Epstein industry when it comes to the pursuit of its quarry. The latest instalment in the ongoing excoriation of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor is the revelation in the Mail on Sunday that the former Prince may, when he dies,… pic.twitter.com/jkTD1cliFb
— The Spectator (@spectator) August 10, 2026
People should be very mistrustful of a media that activates like this; a media which can remain silent for years while people with actual power get away with murder.
RIP Jason Arday.
Featured image via Christian Sinibaldi / Save our Citizenship
By Willem Moore

