Polanski warns Burnham is kicking the can down the road



Zack Polanski and Andy Burnham

On Monday 29 June, Andy Burnham finally gave us a fleshed out idea of what he has planned for the country. The answer – essentially – was more of the same. And while he is proposing a few actual changes, they won’t scratch the surface of the massive problems facing us.

One person to recognise this was Zack Polanski, who said the following:

Another 10 years

As Polanski notes, Burnham is already mimicking what Starmer said; he’s just sounding more human when he says it. Starmer’s mixture of doom-and-gloom politics with his total lack of charisma made him an unpopular politician from the jump, so Burnham’s likeability isn’t nothing. It’s just not enough.

Political commentator Devutopia went through Burnham’s speech and managed to identify all the times he directly aped his predecessors.

This included:

Devolution

Burnham today: “the biggest transfer of power out of Whitehall in modern times.”

Cameron, 2010: “the biggest, most dramatic redistribution of power from elites in Whitehall to the man and woman on the street.”

Starmer, 2026: “the biggest devolution drive in a generation.”

Housing

Burnham today: “the biggest council housebuilding programme since the post-war era.”

Johnson: pledged 300,000 homes a year.

Starmer: pledged 1.5 million homes by 2030.We have a housing crisis that has got worse through every single one of those promises.

Jobs and young people

Burnham today: “giving every young person a clear path into a reindustrialised Britain.”

Cameron: expanded apprenticeships as the route for young people into work.

Johnson: Kickstart scheme. Skills. Levelling up.

Starmer: “no class ceiling on the ambitions of young people in Britain.”

Nationwide growth

Burnham today: “good growth in every postcode.”

Johnson, 2021: “raise living standards, spread opportunity across the whole UK.”

Starmer, 2023: “good jobs and productivity growth in every part of the country.”

Cameron: rebalancing the economy beyond London and the South East.

So what actually differentiates Burnham?

As our own Ed Sykes reported, the future PM promised two things which set him apart from Starmer:

  • No 10 North (a Northern branch of 10 Downing Street which will exist to show the government’s commitment to devolution).
  • A promise to build more council houses than any time since the post-war period (could be good, but bear in mind we’ve barely built any in the intervening years, so he could get away with doing very little).

Will any of this be enough to turn yesterday’s empty words into tomorrow’s solid future?

The Greens certainly don’t think so.

Burnham Bounce is real – but then what?

The ‘Burnham Bounce‘ definitely seems to be a thing, but it’s hard to imagine it persisting unless Burnham can show actual change. Accordingly, the Greens are eyeing up the same long-term strategy as they were under Starmer:

The Greens also highlighted that Burnham made no mention of the climate crisis, despite the record-breaking heatwave we just suffered through:

Burnham also failed to propose wealth taxes, despite having hinted at wanting to do so in recent weeks:

The more things change

We’ve been saying for months now that Burnham is likely to be continuity Starmerism. When everyone gets a measure of Burnham, remember it was people like us, Zack Polanski, and Devutopia who warned you this was all smoke and mirrors.

Featured image via the Canary

By Willem Moore





Source link

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Tags: , , , , , , , ,