Jenrick confirms accuracy of the Times’ Farage exposé



Nigel Farage and Robert Jenrick

On Sunday 5 July, the Times published a brand new exposé on Nigel Farage. In it, they reported that Farage accepted various benefits from the criminal aristocrat George Cottrell. Now, the weasel Robert Jenrick has confirmed the key points of the story:

Farage — Dropped in it

The Times’ Gabriel Pogrund announced the Farage exposé as follows:

As noted, the big issue for Farage isn’t that he accepted financial support from Cottrell; it’s that he failed to declare it when he became an MP. We now know this will probably lead to a Parliamentary Standards investigation, because Liberal Democrat Josh Babarinde MP has reported him:

Should this not go Farage’s way, the Reform leader could find himself fighting a by-election to hold on to his Clacton seat.

Fun and games.

You have to imagine Reform UK hoped Robert Jenrick would distract from all this on the Sunday interviews. Instead, he confirmed the key points that the Times unveiled.

He confirmed it on GB News too:

Jenrick claimed Farage didn’t have to declare anything because he wasn’t an MP yet. The problem, as anyone can see, is that the things Cottrell funded clearly seem to have contributed towards Farage becoming an MP. And if that’s found to be the case, they should have been declared.

According to whistleblower Mr Ethical, Jenrick also lied:

When asked if Farage is a “liability”, Jenrick talked about him being in America for the past few days, as if that’s supposed to benefit anyone in the UK:

As Trevor Phillips said:

To remind you, he’s a British MP!

Nothing to see here!

In a further sign of how panicked Reform UK is, its top politicians are clumsily trying to deflect from the scandal:

And Jenrick literally used the phrase “nothing to see here” unironically:

Farage has wriggled out of many situations, but the walls do seem to be closing in now.

If we were him, we’d consider not coming back from America, honestly.

Featured image via the Canary

By Willem Moore





Source link

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted